Assessment Principles
The University of Calgary has created eleven principles to guide practices for the assessment of student learning.
Background
The principles are the result of an extensive two-year process that included a comprehensive literature review, an environmental scan of U15 institutions, and widespread campus consultations. The consultation process engaged over 450 people across UCalgary, including students, faculty, staff, and academic leaders, generating 950+ distinct comments. The process was also guided by Indigenous Elders and scholars to ensure the university's commitment to the ii' taa'poh'to'p Indigenous Strategy is reflected through a parallel process grounded in oral traditions and Indigenous ways of knowing.
Please review the Fall 2025 report that resulted from this consultation or visit the principles resource web page for further information.
Historical documents
GFC (TLC) Briefing Note - October 2, 2025
GFC (TLC) Briefing Note - October 14, 2025
Draft Assessment Principles Report
GFC (TLC) Briefing Note - April 15, 2025
GFC (TLC) Briefing Note - November 19, 2024
Assessment Principles for Student Learning / Executive Summary for Consultations
Principles for the Assessment of Student Learning
A) Assessment meaningfully supports student learning and growth, is grounded in disciplinary context and highlights applicability and relevance.
B) Assessment practices demonstrate alignment within the curriculum and modality of the course and program, progressively building upon and reflecting student learning, skills, and competencies throughout their academic journey.
C) Assessment cultivates a shared and ethical space that respects written and oral traditions and honours diverse Indigenous cultural protocols, perspectives and knowledges.
D) Assessments are designed to be fair, accessible, equitable and inclusive for diverse educators and learners, and provide multiple ways for students to engage with learning.
E) Assessments actively engage students by offering multiple opportunities for practice; timely, clear, and meaningful feedback; and structured reflection on their learning to continuously improve and enhance future learning.
F) Communications about assessments are transparent and designed to ensure clarity on the policies, purpose, tasks, grading standards, and criteria by which students will be assessed.
G) Assessments consider the mental health and wellbeing of students and educators by recognizing the human and systemic contexts.
H) Assessments uphold the values, principles, and practices of academic integrity.
I) Educators and students use educational technologies ethically in assessment and feedback practices, and take proactive measures to mitigate barriers, adverse impacts, and biases.
J) Assessments inform administrative and curricular processes, including quality assurance and alignment with professional accreditation standards, to continuously enhance educational quality and student success.
K) The assessment ecosystem is sustainably supported by organizational policies, processes, resources, professional learning, and digital and physical infrastructure.
Why Principles for Assessment?
Principles for the assessment of student learning provide a framework and foundation to help guide assessment practices, policies, guidelines, procedures, discussions, and decision-making across multiple organization levels. Assessment practices are influenced by individual educators, and a myriad of policies, procedures, networks, and supports across the academic community.
Assessment Principles Group (APG)
The intent of the Assessment Principles Group (APG) is to bring together individuals with interest, expertise and experience in the assessment of student learning to begin to frame the discussion around the development of assessment principles for student learning at the University of Calgary.
UCalgary strives to achieve membership that is reflective of our commitment to diversity and inclusion, and this should be considered in the appointment of Assessment Principles Group members. All members should bring together interest, expertise and experience in the assessment of student learning.
-
Natasha Kenny (Administrative co-chair)
Executive Director, Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
-
Mark Bauer (Academic co-chair)
Interim Associate Dean (Teaching, Learning and Student Engagement), Faculty of Science
-
Adil Arshad
Educational Development Consultant, Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
-
Jenny Godley
Associate Dean, Transdisciplinary Scholarship, Faculty of Graduate Studies
-
Fabiola Aparicio-Ting
Associate Dean (Undergraduate Health & Science Education), Cumming School of Medicine
-
Kim Grant
Educational Development Consultant, Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
-
Christine Martineau
Educational Development Consultant, Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
-
Shannon Parker
Associate Professor (Teaching), Faculty of Nursing
-
Roxanne Ross
Director, Student Success Centre, Student & Enrolment Services
-
Marie-Claire Shanahan
Associate Dean (Teaching and Learning)
-
Christina Furtado
Assistant Registrar, Office of the Registrar
-
Andrew Szeto
Executive Director, Office of Institutional Commitments
-
Gabriela Dziegielewska
VP Academic, SU
-
Jacob Amengor
VP Academic, GSA
-
Robin Arsenault
Teaching & Learning Project Coordinator, Vice Provost (Teaching & Learning)
-
Brandi Dickman
Administrative & Project Assistant, Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
Environmental Scan
To learn more about the development and implementation of assessment principles for student learning at the institutional level, the APG conducted an environmental scan of Canadian U15 universities. The objective was to develop a high-level understanding of what assessment principles for student learning are in place at leading research-intensive universities in Canada, and to learn how and where these principles were identified or discussed on their respective websites.
Literature Review
The Student Learning Assessment in Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review is a comprehensive report of the literature that identifies the current and dominant trends, discourses, and directions related to student assessment practices. This literature review, along with the environmental scan, will offer valuable insights and guidelines for developing principles for the assessment of student learning at UCalgary.